Showing archive for: “Monopolization”
The FTC’s Zombie Antitrust Action Against Meta Continues to Lurch Forward
FTC v. Meta Platforms Inc. has gone to court, and trial is just underway in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleges that Meta is currently, in 2025, engaged in monopolization in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by dint of having acquired Instagram ... The FTC’s Zombie Antitrust Action Against Meta Continues to Lurch Forward
Competition Confusion in the UK
UK Member of Parliament (former Conservative Party Cabinet Minister) Kit Malthouse published an essay in CapX earlier this month titled “We need a competition revolution.” I, of course, completely agree that competition is vitally important to any economy, and the UK has been struggling with productivity and growth challenges that may be linked to competition ... Competition Confusion in the UK
What Changes Might, and Should, a New FTC Majority Bring?
The question on everyone’s mind—that is, for those in antitrust law and economics, the question on everyone’s mind that’s about antitrust—is this: Where do we go from here? As it happens, the International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) recently hosted a panel discussion on precisely that question. ICLE’s Geoff Manne moderated an excellent discussion ... What Changes Might, and Should, a New FTC Majority Bring?
Can Antitrust Promote Competitiveness?
The major Western industrialized nations have experienced dramatically slower economic growth in recent decades. This slowdown has been particularly pronounced in the EU, though the United States has suffered, as well. Regulatory, tax, trade, and energy policy reforms that reduce market distortions and provide incentives for investment, production, and innovation could substantially address this problem. Recalibrating antitrust law (called ... Can Antitrust Promote Competitiveness?
Beyond Market Definition: Key Economic Concepts in FTC v Amazon
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) antitrust suit against Amazon, originally filed in October 2023, is scheduled for trial in October 2026. While we’ve previously explored the market-definition questions at the center of this case, several other economic concepts will be equally important in determining whether Amazon has violated antitrust laws. Ahead of a scheduled March ... Beyond Market Definition: Key Economic Concepts in FTC v Amazon
Avoiding Misguided Remedies in the Google Search Antitrust Case
In his August 2024 ruling in the Google Search antitrust litigation, U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta found that Google’s default-distribution agreements—through which the company paid Apple, Mozilla, and others to make Google the preloaded search engine—were exclusionary under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The court’s rationale focused on “default bias” and scale effects; ... Avoiding Misguided Remedies in the Google Search Antitrust Case
Market Definition in FTC v. Amazon: A Crucial Battleground
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) antitrust suit against Amazon, originally filed in October 2023, is scheduled for trial in October 2026. In the meantime, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington has scheduled a March 7 “economics day” hearing to focus on fundamental economic concepts that will shape the case—including the crucial ... Market Definition in FTC v. Amazon: A Crucial Battleground
Stop Blaming Rising Egg Prices on Market Power
Egg prices are in the news again. Policy responses will likely follow. But not all policy responses make sense. Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently highlighted empty egg shelves and skyrocketing prices, calling for an investigation into potential market manipulation. While his concerns about the egg industry’s supply chain deserve attention, basic ... Stop Blaming Rising Egg Prices on Market Power
The Paradox of Google Search Remedies
The U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) won its antitrust case against Google last year, establishing that the company illegally maintained its monopoly in “general search” and “general search text advertising” markets through exclusive default contracts. Now comes the hard part: crafting effective remedies. I’m on record as saying the question of remedies would be difficult in ... The Paradox of Google Search Remedies
Parsing Brazil’s ‘More Flexible’ Approach to Digital Markets
Following an extensive consultation period, Brazil’s Ministério da Fazenda (Ministry of Finance) last October unveiled its final digital-platform report. Given the public stances previously taken by Brazil’s would-be digital regulators—the antitrust agency Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE) and the telecommunications regulator Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (Anatel)—it was likely inevitable that the report would endorse ... Parsing Brazil’s ‘More Flexible’ Approach to Digital Markets
The FTC’s Baffling Chinese Affair
In a column last Friday, I noted a spate of matters being rushed through the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the final weeks of Lina Khan’s tenure as chair. I was hardly the only one to notice (see the dissenting statements of Chairman Andrew Ferguson and Commissioner Melissa Holyoak on the FTC’s closed Jan. 16 ... The FTC’s Baffling Chinese Affair
A Possible Federal Role in Reducing State Red Tape
The incoming Trump administration’s commitment to reduce extremely costly regulatory burdens will feature the new Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) evaluation of federal overregulation. But economic research indicates that harmful regulatory bloat exists at the state level, as well. The new administration may wish to propose solutions to state regulatory overreach that harms many Americans. Generic Overregulation at the State ... A Possible Federal Role in Reducing State Red Tape
