The Archives

The collection of all scholarly commentary on law, economics, and more

Showing results for:  “Valid C1000-170 Study Materials ๐Ÿ•— C1000-170 Latest Exam Answers ๐Ÿฎ Trusted C1000-170 Exam Resource ๐Ÿฆ Search on ใ€ www.pdfvce.com ใ€‘ for ใ€ C1000-170 ใ€‘ to obtain exam materials for free download ๐Ÿ€Valid C1000-170 Dumps Demo”

The Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship

Thoughts from John Pfaff (Fordham) here and here.  And here is an excerpt from his first post laying out some of the problems and challenges facing the empirical legal studies movement: So what are the problems we face? 1. An explosion in empirical work. More empirical work is, at some level, a good thing: how ... The Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship

TOTM Symposium Wrap Up

I’d like to formally thank Mike Carrier, Geoff Manne, Phil Weiser, Dan Crane, Brett Frischmann, Scott Kieff and Dennis Crouch for participating in the first TOTM symposium on Mike’s book: Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law.   Thanks also to Dennis for cross-posting at PatentlyO.  Each of the ... TOTM Symposium Wrap Up

Did the Chicago School Overshoot the Mark?

I’ve posted to SSRN a new essay entitled Overshot the Mark?  A Simple Explanation of the Chicago School’s Influence on Antitrust.  It is a book review of Robert Pitofsky’s recent volume How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust, and is forthcoming in Volume 5 of Competition ... Did the Chicago School Overshoot the Mark?

The Cousins Recruiting Saga Continues (Again)

It wasn’t too long ago that I blogged about the purported end of the Demarcus Cousins saga.  For TOTM readers that want to catch up to speed, here is how things stood about a month ago: For those who haven’t, Cousins is a blue chip high school basketball recruit who has been bargaining hard with ... The Cousins Recruiting Saga Continues (Again)

Professor Carrier’s Response

First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Josh Wright. Only because of Josh’s creativity and tireless, flawless execution did this blog symposium come about and run so smoothly. I also would like to thank Dennis Crouch, who has generously cross-posted the symposium at PatentlyO. And I am grateful for the ... Professor Carrier’s Response

Kieff on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century

I, too, join the rest of the participants in congratulating Michael Carrier on this great book about this great topic.  I have enjoyed reading Michael’s work in the past and I enjoyed meeting him at a conference last year.  He is a wonderfully warm, bright, and engaging person.  Although I wish that I had more ... Kieff on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century

Frischmann on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century

I enjoyed reading Mike’s book very much. It provides an excellent primer on antitrust, IP, and innovation.  He synthesizes the legal and economic foundations, contours, and controversies in an accessible fashion. I applaud him for doing this because frankly, it is tough to do given that the fields are quite technical and specialized.  The book ... Frischmann on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century

Crouch on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century

I am enjoying Professor Carrier’s new book Innovation in the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law. I will focus my discussion here on patent issues discussed in Part III of the book. As other commentaries have noted the book is long on conclusions and proposals but somewhat short on justifications for ... Crouch on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century

Symposium Halftime

We’re halfway through the TOTM symposium on Professor Carrier’s Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law.  I’ve provided links to Monday’s posts on the book related to antitrust issues: Dan Crane Phil Weiser Geoff Manne Josh Wright The comments to those posts are still live.  So feel free ... Symposium Halftime

Wright on Carrier's Innovation in the 21st Century

First, I want to join the rest of the participants in congratulating Professor Carrier on an excellent and well-written book emerging out of a thoughtful and ambitious project. The project, and the book, are provocative, important contributions to the literature, and usefully synthesize many of the most important debates in both antitrust and intellectual property. ... Wright on Carrier's Innovation in the 21st Century

Manne on Carrier's Innovation in the 21st Century

Michael Carrier has written a timely and interesting book.  Like Dan, I’m still digesting it (which means, in translation: I have not yet read every word).  There is much to like about the book, in particular its accessible format and content.  I do fear that it is a bit overly ambitious, however, hoping both to ... Manne on Carrier's Innovation in the 21st Century

Weiser on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century

It is trite to say that “we are all Schumpeterians now.”  When it comes to appreciating the importance of innovation and entrepreneurship, however, we are.  Schumpeter, unfortunately, did not leave a theory of innovation that lends itself to easy application to public policy prescriptions, as Brad De Long has explained so clearly.  By so clearly ... Weiser on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century