You’ve seen the blog posts (e.g., here) and the working paper. Now you can get the published article here. Let me know if you want a reprint.
Hot off the press: Law’s Information Revolution
- Home
- About
- Author Info
- Policies
- Disclosures
- Symposia
- Symposium on Antitrust’s Uncertain Future: Visions of Competition in the New Regulatory Landscape
- FTC Rulemaking on Unfair Methods of Competition
- Retrospective on Ajit Pai’s Tenure as FCC Chairman
- Symposium on the Future of American Antitrust: The Google Lawsuits
- Symposium on Big Tech and the Digital Economy: The Moligopoly Scenario
- The Law, Economics, and Policy of the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines Symposium
- FTC v. Qualcomm: Analyzing the theory of the case
- The Politicization of Antitrust
- Should We Break Up Big Tech? Symposium
- Amazon-Whole Foods After One Year Symposium
- Agricultural and Biotech Mergers Symposium
- Apple E-Books Antitrust Case Symposium
- Syposium Honoring the Honorable Joshua Wright
- Unfair Methods of Compettion Sympoisum
- Unlocking the Law Symposium
- Free to Choose Symposium
- The Law & Economics of Interchange Fees Symposium
- Merger Guidelines Symposium
- Section 2 Symposium
- Innovation for the 21st Century Symposium
RSS - Posts
Thanks.
A thorough and useful framework which takes the debate and analysis much further on.
I suspect the 3rd category of legal innovation as securitisable assets is actually a lot further on than the simple litigation cost funder roles that are emerging.
I particularly enjoyed the counter intuitive/economics explanation for why more regulation delivers worse results for consumers. In the UK the current bubble is based around those who preach de-regulation but practice protectionism.
Keep ‘positing’ – it helps.
d