IP Colloquium: Statutory Damages and the Tenenbaum Litigation

Cite this Article
Joshua D. Wright, IP Colloquium: Statutory Damages and the Tenenbaum Litigation, Truth on the Market (March 04, 2009), https://truthonthemarket.com/2009/03/04/ip-colloquium-statutory-damages-and-the-tenenbaum-litigation/

Over at Doug Lichtman’s IP Colloquium, there is a new (and what looks to be very interesting) program up on the Tenenbaum file-sharing litigation. Here’s the description:

Joel Tenenbaum looks a lot like every other defendant who has been accused by the music industry of illegally sharing copyrighted work online, but with one key difference: his defense attorney is Harvard Law School Professor Charlie Nesson, and Nesson is out to turn his case into a public referendum not only on the music industry’s efforts to enforce copyright through these direct-infringer suits, but also on the copyright rules that make the industry litigation possible.

In this program, we engage Nesson’s key arguments, focusing especially on Nesson’s claim that copyright law’s statutory damages regime runs afoul of constitutional protections against excessive and/or arbitrary civil damages awards.

Guests include Professor Nesson himself; Steven Marks, General Counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America; and three of the leading academic experts on punitive damages: New York University Professor Catherine Sharkey, Florida State Professor Dan Markel, and George Washington University Professor Thomas Colby. UCLA Law Professor Doug Lichtman moderates.

Check it out, and maybe earn a few CLE credits in the process.