Angelo’s escape

Larry Ribstein —  23 February 2011

So Mozilo won’t be criminally prosecuted for Countrywide.  Holman Jenkins writes in today’s WSJ:

The incentive to bring a case against a vilified public figure, of course, is huge. Weighed against this, however, must be the chance of being humiliated by a judge, possibly censured, now that the legal system has started blowing the whistle on cases that strain to arrange the ill- fitting garments of criminal law around business defendants. * * *

Mr. Mozilo’s first thank-you note should probably go to Mark Belnick, the former Tyco executive whom a jury found did not commit “grand larceny” by accepting a bonus authorized by the company’s CEO. Mr. Belnick’s acquittal in 2004, in retrospect, was a harbinger.

There followed a pair of stock-option backdating cases thrown out by judges on grounds of “prosecutorial misconduct” that amounted to trying to make innocuous behavior appear nefarious. Two Bear Stearns executives were acquitted of the non-crime of losing money in the housing bubble. Capping off the trend was a Supreme Court decision last year disarming the “honest services” blunderbuss, which threatened to turn any self-interested behavior by a CEO into a crime.

Jenkins explains that Mozilo’s supposed crime was trafficking in “whatever types of loans seemed to be acceptable in the marketplace to consumers and sellable to Wall Street as securities.” Mozilo basically got caught in a bubble.  He expected the company to be around to “pick up the pieces when the ‘innovators’ had exited,” as Jenkins says. He didn’t foresee “unprecedented collapse in home prices” or “Countrywide’s own funding drying up overnight.”

So Mozilo avoided jail for following the crowd and not foreseeing the unexpected.  That left him better off than Jeff Skilling or Ken Lay.  Hopefully this prosecutorial forbearance will become a trend.  But based on the incentives and institutions I discuss in my Agents Prosecuting Agents, I’m not so sure about that.

Larry Ribstein


Professor of Law, University of Illinois College of Law

3 responses to Angelo’s escape


    My guess would be that Angelo’s consiglieri told the Feds that if Angelo were put on trial, it would be held in the fall of 2012, and they would subpoena Dodd, Frank, and the other “Friends of Angelo”. The totally apolitical DoJ, under the guidance of the Brilliant Eric Holder did not call David Axelrod or Valerie Jarret who would have said, that is was a risk they were [not] willing to run.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. Fuld, Mozilo and Raj « Truth on the Market - March 12, 2011

    […] weeks ago Angelo Mozilo’s criminal investigation also ended without charges.  At the time I discussed a Holman Jenkins column explaining […]

  2. An inside speech for Inside Job « Truth on the Market - February 28, 2011

    […] Recent Comments Tung Yin on The economics of televisionLarry Ribstein on The economics of televisionTung Yin on The economics of televisionPithlord on A nation of lawyers and judgesApple, Antitrust, and the FTC « Truth on the Market on Tim Wu to the FTC: What does it mean?N. Joseph Potts on Death to insider tradersemerson on Death to insider tradersTrumpit on Death to insider tradersSome Links | Daily Libertarian on Death to insider tradersWalter Sobchak on Angelo’s escape […]