Predicting the Nobel Again …

Josh Wright —  7 October 2007

Greg Mankiw and Tyler Cowen have started the speculation. Cowen prefers “Anne Krueger, Jagdish Bhagwati, and Gordon Tullock for their work on rent-seeking” but predicts a behavioral finance prize to Fama, Thaler & French or a prize for research on the principal-agent theory of the firm to Williamson and/or Tirole. Mankiw predicts Fama, Feldstein, or Barro based on some citation analysis. Thomson Scientific adds their own predictions here.

I should note that I’m not very good at this Nobel prediction game. Last year I incorrectly predicted that Fama, Thaler & French would win the prize and ended up losing a very expensive and tasty dinner bet to Geoff. While those were my predictions, I made the case that the prize should go to either Tullock (rent-seeking) or jointly to Alchian, Demsetz and Klein (theory of the firm, property rights, transaction costs economics — can we just call this contributions to industrial organization?). Its a new year. But I don’t see why my picks should change this year. I haven’t learned anything between then and now about how these things work, and my views on the economists certainly haven’t changed. So here goes:

  • Prediction: Fama, Thaler and French.
  • Preference: A prize to the UCLA group of Alchian, Demsetz and Klein or my colleague Gordon Tullock.

Geoff: Want to take advantage of my stubbornness and take the field again against a group including Fama, Thaler, Williamson, Holmstrom, and Barro?

4 responses to Predicting the Nobel Again …

  1. 

    I can taste my burger now . . . .

    I don’t have much to say about this year’s winners, except that mechanism design is increasingly important in the world of online markets, and I have no doubt that these guys are smart and important. But other than that, I know nothing about them. Oh, except for one supremely important thing: Myerson is a professor at Chicago, which, of course, deserves another Nobel; it’s been too long.

  2. 

    Yes, I’m trying to improve my odds a bit. I’m still reeling from last years embarrassing loss. Who knows how these things go. If they made any sense, Alchian would have already won.

  3. 

    I see you’re hedging your bet this year. Last year I got the field against only three economists. This year you’re nearly doubling the size of your group. Fine. I still like my odds. And just because I insisted on ordering a drink with my burger and fries does not make the meal “expensive.” Sheesh. (Just to clarify one thing in case I lose: My prediction is some combination of Fama, Thaler, Williamson, Holmstrom and Barro. I just can’t possibly pass up the odds).

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. TRUTH ON THE MARKET » Peking University IEPR Antitrust Conference - October 14, 2007

    […] lawyers, and law and economics luminaries Harold Demsetz (the same one that should win the Nobel Prize Tuesday …) and Henry Manne. While there were far too many perspectives offered on the various […]