The Archives

The collection of all scholarly commentary on law, economics, and more

Showing results for:  “price gouging”

Interchange Fees Are Not Rising: Correcting the GAO Report

Next summer, the World Cup, the world’s most watched sporting event, marks its quadrennial return.  Although thirty-two teams will compete in South Africa, the list of favorites begins with the two teams that have won half of the previous eighteen tournaments and three of the last four—Brazil and Italy.  Brazil plays an open and flowing ... Interchange Fees Are Not Rising: Correcting the GAO Report

Credit Cards in Context: Framing the Discussion

While the GAO report provides a useful summary of many of the issues being debated within the credit card community, the GAO’s mandate was, in some ways, rather narrow.  The GAO was asked to “review (1) how the fees merchants pay have changed over time and the factors affecting the competitiveness of the credit card ... Credit Cards in Context: Framing the Discussion

Seven Truths About Regulating Interchange

Interchange fees on payment cards are obviously a hot topic in the United States, but also in Europe and in many other countries around the world.  The report on interchange fees released last month by the US Government Accounting Office (GAO) notes that more than 30 countries have intervened or are considering intervening in the ... Seven Truths About Regulating Interchange

Moving the Ball Forward: Macroeconomic Considerations

What is most surprising about the GAO report is how little the analytical discussion of this subject has advanced in the last decade.  We all know that interchange rates might contribute to higher retail prices: customers that use cheaper payment products can be said to “subsidize” customers that use credit cards.  Starting with the Australian ... Moving the Ball Forward: Macroeconomic Considerations

Why Now? The Faulty Economics of Credit Card Reform

About four years ago, I worked for Visa in opposing the opposed limitations on interchange fees that the Australian government was about to impose on the credit card industry. The situation there, like the situation in the United States, seemed hardly propitious for reform.  The use of credit cards was rapidly expanding, and the rate ... Why Now? The Faulty Economics of Credit Card Reform

The Incorporation Transparency Act

This post is based on a legal backgrounder I recently published with the Washington Legal Foundation, which is available here.  This analysis is cross-posted from the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation. The Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act, introduced by Senators Levin, Grassley, and McCaskill and currently pending before the ... The Incorporation Transparency Act

DOJ Disconnect: Do we really need a roadshow?

And now for something completely different. Being the only non-lawyer economist in the group seems to warrant such a preface sometimes. Earlier this semester I received a call from a reporter for a nearby small-town newspaper. The DOJ had just announced its intent to hold a series of workshops jointly with the USDA to “explore ... DOJ Disconnect: Do we really need a roadshow?

A Decision-Theoretic Rule of Reason for Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

My latest working paper, which bears the same title as this post, is now available on SSRN. In the paper, I address the challenge created by the Supreme Court’s 2007 Leegin decision, which abrogated the 96 year-old rule declaring resale price maintenance (RPM) to be per se illegal. The Leegin Court held that instances of ... A Decision-Theoretic Rule of Reason for Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

PeaceHealth and De Facto Exclusive Dealing, Part III

Josh’s thoughtful response (Bitchslap? Nah.) to my post criticizing the Ninth Circuit’s recent Masimo decision raises a number of important matters. I started to just submit a comment to Josh’s post, but then I figured a reply was post-worthy. (I don’t want the antitrust nerds who read these technical posts — and here’s to you, ... PeaceHealth and De Facto Exclusive Dealing, Part III

Gelbach, Helland and Klick on Single Firm, Single Event Studies

Larry Ribstein points to the new paper from Gelbach, Helland and Klick on Valid Inference in Single Firm, Single Event Studies.  This is an important paper with implications for finance, securities litigation and antitrust where event studies are frequently used as economic expert evidence.  Ribstein gives a good, non-technical explanation of its contribution: Essentially what’s ... Gelbach, Helland and Klick on Single Firm, Single Event Studies

Should PeaceHealth Apply to De Facto Exclusive Dealing Claims?

Thom answers this question in the affirmative in his excellent post about the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Masimo and is disappointed that the Ninth Circuit rejected the discount attribution standard as the sole test for Section 2 in favor of a separate inquiry as to whether the bundled discount arrangement resulted in a substantial foreclosure ... Should PeaceHealth Apply to De Facto Exclusive Dealing Claims?

As New York goes, so goes the FTC?

The New York Times is reporting that New York’s attorney general, Andrew Cuomo, has filed an antitrust suit against Intel.  According to the report, The New York move increases the chances that the F.T.C. will take action against Intel, according to a person who was familiar with the state’s investigation but was not authorized to ... As New York goes, so goes the FTC?