<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macey Throws Some Cold Water on the CFPB&#8217;s New Mortgage Disclosures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2012/07/18/macey-throws-some-cold-water-on-the-cfpbs-new-mortgage-disclosures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2012/07/18/macey-throws-some-cold-water-on-the-cfpbs-new-mortgage-disclosures/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 22:36:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Information Overload</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2012/07/18/macey-throws-some-cold-water-on-the-cfpbs-new-mortgage-disclosures/#comment-48860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Overload]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthonthemarket.com/?p=13734#comment-48860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the sentiments of Northfolk investor, and I agree with Josh that ultimately it&#039;s a wait-and-see empirical question. However, I take issue with Macey&#039;s emphasis on &quot;consumer choice.&quot; He assumes that consumer choice is always good, and more choice is better. More is not always better, as demonstrated by countless information overload studies. The point at which this overload occurs is an empirical question. Still, someone loses credibility with me when they take a &quot;more is always better&quot; approach to consumer choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the sentiments of Northfolk investor, and I agree with Josh that ultimately it&#8217;s a wait-and-see empirical question. However, I take issue with Macey&#8217;s emphasis on &#8220;consumer choice.&#8221; He assumes that consumer choice is always good, and more choice is better. More is not always better, as demonstrated by countless information overload studies. The point at which this overload occurs is an empirical question. Still, someone loses credibility with me when they take a &#8220;more is always better&#8221; approach to consumer choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: northfork investor</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2012/07/18/macey-throws-some-cold-water-on-the-cfpbs-new-mortgage-disclosures/#comment-48859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[northfork investor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthonthemarket.com/?p=13734#comment-48859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macey is a contemporary of mine but I sometimes challenge his experience factor.  Has he refinanced using the new forms?  I am not a stranger to modern day finance (or even that of 40 years ago).  The old disclosure forms were impossible to decipher and substantially no mortgage broker understood them either.  Forget how many pieces of paper there are.  The new forms are easier to understand and the numbers on them actually mean something.

Some of the consumer choices Macey is concerned about reducing are empirically limited to very few people.  Restricting loan modification fees is not a big deal particularly given the difficulty in actually getting a loan modified.  Unless your bank owns and services and hasn&#039;t packaged your loan, you cannot get one done period (without some sort of governmental assistance or mandate).  I have tried to negotiate interest rate adjustments to market in return  for fees several times over the last 30 years and instead have always had to exercise my zero cost call option to refinance.  The swap products that are sometimes offered are a sucker&#039;s product of hidden costs and fees.   That&#039;s a dead weight loss.  Similarly restricting interest-only products (because virtually no such products contractually obligate balloon payments except for structured products that cannot be packaged) affect only a very small (and rich) group of borrowers whose loans will be held by their underwriters to maturity.

Finally APR.  Reducing all the cost factors of a mortgage to a single factor was always an exercise in absurdity for different mortgage products.  APR simplifies the calculations so much as to be virtually worthless.  Focusing on the various components of the loan product is exactly what consumers need to do and allow individual preferences to choose the product that best suits them particularly when optionality and risk management is so important for individual household decisions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Macey is a contemporary of mine but I sometimes challenge his experience factor.  Has he refinanced using the new forms?  I am not a stranger to modern day finance (or even that of 40 years ago).  The old disclosure forms were impossible to decipher and substantially no mortgage broker understood them either.  Forget how many pieces of paper there are.  The new forms are easier to understand and the numbers on them actually mean something.</p>
<p>Some of the consumer choices Macey is concerned about reducing are empirically limited to very few people.  Restricting loan modification fees is not a big deal particularly given the difficulty in actually getting a loan modified.  Unless your bank owns and services and hasn&#8217;t packaged your loan, you cannot get one done period (without some sort of governmental assistance or mandate).  I have tried to negotiate interest rate adjustments to market in return  for fees several times over the last 30 years and instead have always had to exercise my zero cost call option to refinance.  The swap products that are sometimes offered are a sucker&#8217;s product of hidden costs and fees.   That&#8217;s a dead weight loss.  Similarly restricting interest-only products (because virtually no such products contractually obligate balloon payments except for structured products that cannot be packaged) affect only a very small (and rich) group of borrowers whose loans will be held by their underwriters to maturity.</p>
<p>Finally APR.  Reducing all the cost factors of a mortgage to a single factor was always an exercise in absurdity for different mortgage products.  APR simplifies the calculations so much as to be virtually worthless.  Focusing on the various components of the loan product is exactly what consumers need to do and allow individual preferences to choose the product that best suits them particularly when optionality and risk management is so important for individual household decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
