<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Note to Simon Johnson: I do not think antitrust means what you think it means</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2010/01/21/note-to-simon-johnson-i-do-not-think-antitrust-means-what-you-think-it-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2010/01/21/note-to-simon-johnson-i-do-not-think-antitrust-means-what-you-think-it-means/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2010/01/21/note-to-simon-johnson-i-do-not-think-antitrust-means-what-you-think-it-means/#comment-8150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/?p=3792#comment-8150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds much like the Hart Deconcentration Act, which Sen. Hart introduced back in the late `60s.  Essentially, it would have broken up the largest firms in any &quot;industry&quot; (defined, I guess, by Census SIC codes) where certain concentration threshholds were exceeded (you can read this Act in all its glory in the back of the famous Goldschmidt &quot;New Learning&quot; book).  No theory behind it, really, beyond a simplistic S-C-P syllogism.  But this actually is more than what Simon Johnson has to offer -- as Geoff notes, what he really is searching for is an ex post rationalization for a predetermined policy.  Pretty shameful for an economist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds much like the Hart Deconcentration Act, which Sen. Hart introduced back in the late `60s.  Essentially, it would have broken up the largest firms in any &#8220;industry&#8221; (defined, I guess, by Census SIC codes) where certain concentration threshholds were exceeded (you can read this Act in all its glory in the back of the famous Goldschmidt &#8220;New Learning&#8221; book).  No theory behind it, really, beyond a simplistic S-C-P syllogism.  But this actually is more than what Simon Johnson has to offer &#8212; as Geoff notes, what he really is searching for is an ex post rationalization for a predetermined policy.  Pretty shameful for an economist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

