<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sarbox Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/12/04/a-sarbox-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/12/04/a-sarbox-update/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/12/04/a-sarbox-update/#comment-7939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/?p=3285#comment-7939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have heard that once upon a time in 2002, one idea was to integrate the PCAOB&#039;s operations as a separate division within the SEC-- that is, a Division of Public Accounting Oversight, along with the Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Enforcement, etc.

I can&#039;t help but wonder where we would be today if Washington had gone that route-- because, really, going to court over the constitutional issue is a diversion from the true reason critics hate SOX: It costs too much. But rather than argue their case in Congress that we should lower our standards for accurate financial reports (because that&#039;s what SOX is all about, and that&#039;s what &#039;relaxed&#039; SOX compliance is), they&#039;ve gone running to the judiciary with any excuse they could find to overturn a law they don&#039;t like. This is exactly the judicial activism conservatives so forcefully denounce-- right up until they need it to suit their purposes. Then it&#039;s OK. Sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard that once upon a time in 2002, one idea was to integrate the PCAOB&#8217;s operations as a separate division within the SEC&#8211; that is, a Division of Public Accounting Oversight, along with the Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Enforcement, etc.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but wonder where we would be today if Washington had gone that route&#8211; because, really, going to court over the constitutional issue is a diversion from the true reason critics hate SOX: It costs too much. But rather than argue their case in Congress that we should lower our standards for accurate financial reports (because that&#8217;s what SOX is all about, and that&#8217;s what &#8216;relaxed&#8217; SOX compliance is), they&#8217;ve gone running to the judiciary with any excuse they could find to overturn a law they don&#8217;t like. This is exactly the judicial activism conservatives so forcefully denounce&#8211; right up until they need it to suit their purposes. Then it&#8217;s OK. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

