<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PeaceHealth Should Apply Even When a Bundled Discount Results in &quot;De Facto&quot; Exclusive Dealing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/11/03/bundled-discounts-market-share-discounts-exclusive-dealing-and-the-discount-attribution-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/11/03/bundled-discounts-market-share-discounts-exclusive-dealing-and-the-discount-attribution-standard/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Should PeaceHealth Apply to De Facto Exclusive Dealing Claims?</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/11/03/bundled-discounts-market-share-discounts-exclusive-dealing-and-the-discount-attribution-standard/#comment-7906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Should PeaceHealth Apply to De Facto Exclusive Dealing Claims?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/?p=3049#comment-7906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] answers this question in the affirmative in his excellent post about the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s analysis in Masimo and is disappointed that the Ninth Circuit [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] answers this question in the affirmative in his excellent post about the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s analysis in Masimo and is disappointed that the Ninth Circuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

