<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did the Chicago School Overshoot the Mark?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/04/02/did-the-chicago-school-overshoot-the-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/04/02/did-the-chicago-school-overshoot-the-mark/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: european_scholar</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/04/02/did-the-chicago-school-overshoot-the-mark/#comment-7644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[european_scholar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/04/02/did-the-chicago-school-overshoot-the-mark/#comment-7644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess one could also argue that Post-Chicago thinking, rather than pure Chicago School economics, have influenced recent antitrust policy in the US. Notably regarding vertical restraints the court has not accepted per se legality, but rather favours a rule of reason approach balancing pro-competitive and anti-competitive effects in each single case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess one could also argue that Post-Chicago thinking, rather than pure Chicago School economics, have influenced recent antitrust policy in the US. Notably regarding vertical restraints the court has not accepted per se legality, but rather favours a rule of reason approach balancing pro-competitive and anti-competitive effects in each single case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

