<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TradeComet.com v. Google (UPDATED: With Complaint)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TradeComet complaint against Google dismissed &#124; TRUTH ON THE MARKET</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-7583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TradeComet complaint against Google dismissed &#124; TRUTH ON THE MARKET]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-7583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] antitrust suit against Google has been dismissed by the S.D.N.Y. Court in which the case was being heard.  The opinion is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] antitrust suit against Google has been dismissed by the S.D.N.Y. Court in which the case was being heard.  The opinion is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yong Chao</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-7582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yong Chao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-7582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the information above, it looks more like refusal to deal.

The same as Thom, it is interesting to see what&#039;s really going on in this case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the information above, it looks more like refusal to deal.</p>
<p>The same as Thom, it is interesting to see what&#8217;s really going on in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-7581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/02/18/tradecometcom-v-google/#comment-7581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TradeComet had better have more than this press release suggests.  Where&#039;s the unreasonably exclusionary conduct?  Raising the price you charge to a competitor?  It seems Trinko would foreclose that theory.  Inducing TradeComet to expend resources to make changes and then not reducing price as promised?  That sounds like a breach of contract, at worst.  Would that count as unreasonably exclusionary conduct so as to warrant imposition of treble damages in antitrust?  I look forward to reading the complaint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TradeComet had better have more than this press release suggests.  Where&#8217;s the unreasonably exclusionary conduct?  Raising the price you charge to a competitor?  It seems Trinko would foreclose that theory.  Inducing TradeComet to expend resources to make changes and then not reducing price as promised?  That sounds like a breach of contract, at worst.  Would that count as unreasonably exclusionary conduct so as to warrant imposition of treble damages in antitrust?  I look forward to reading the complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

