<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fannie and Freddie as &quot;Greater Fools&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Warnings for Modern Pigovians (from Pigou Himself) &#124; TRUTH ON THE MARKET</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some Warnings for Modern Pigovians (from Pigou Himself) &#124; TRUTH ON THE MARKET]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] they are seeking to correct is, in fact, private; in reality, it&#8217;s often not (see, e.g., the role of Fannie and Freddie in creating the housing bubble at the heart of the financial crisis, the role of the tax deduction [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they are seeking to correct is, in fact, private; in reality, it&#8217;s often not (see, e.g., the role of Fannie and Freddie in creating the housing bubble at the heart of the financial crisis, the role of the tax deduction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Another Mis-step in Reactionary Regulation</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Another Mis-step in Reactionary Regulation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] not more, importantly, &#8220;just don&#8217;t&#8221; impose financial market distortions (such as federally-subsidized mortgages to sub-prime borrowers) in order to achieve political and social engineering [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not more, importantly, &#8220;just don&#8217;t&#8221; impose financial market distortions (such as federally-subsidized mortgages to sub-prime borrowers) in order to achieve political and social engineering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fannie and Freddie weren&#039;t the only ones buying bad mortgages.  The investment banks gobbled them up just as readily, so they could securitize them and offer them up to their investors.  They enabled these bad loans just as much as F&amp;F.  And F&amp;F at least, did not exacerbate their situations by leveraging themselves up 33 to 1.  So the investment banks and other entites in the shadow banking realm were just as much, if not more to blame for the mess we are in.  And a more prudent regulatory regime could have taken much of the bite out of the current crisis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fannie and Freddie weren&#8217;t the only ones buying bad mortgages.  The investment banks gobbled them up just as readily, so they could securitize them and offer them up to their investors.  They enabled these bad loans just as much as F&amp;F.  And F&amp;F at least, did not exacerbate their situations by leveraging themselves up 33 to 1.  So the investment banks and other entites in the shadow banking realm were just as much, if not more to blame for the mess we are in.  And a more prudent regulatory regime could have taken much of the bite out of the current crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dfelton</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dfelton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please vote for Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party candidate for president.

There are a number of good reasons. Clearly McCain has no chance now. He shot his bolt.

Moreover, why vote for McCain? He voted for the bailout, just like Obama. Why not send a message to both parties that it is time to vote on principles.

Only Bob Barr is moral enough and conservative enough to deal with the issue of housing, Wall Street, and the rest of the current mess. He has not taken a cent from Fannie or Freddie or from any of the Wall Street firms that profit from the bailout. And Bob Barr has the support of Rep. Ron Paul, who did so well in the Republican primary debates.

Here’s  Bob’s Web site: http://www.bobbarr2008.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please vote for Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party candidate for president.</p>
<p>There are a number of good reasons. Clearly McCain has no chance now. He shot his bolt.</p>
<p>Moreover, why vote for McCain? He voted for the bailout, just like Obama. Why not send a message to both parties that it is time to vote on principles.</p>
<p>Only Bob Barr is moral enough and conservative enough to deal with the issue of housing, Wall Street, and the rest of the current mess. He has not taken a cent from Fannie or Freddie or from any of the Wall Street firms that profit from the bailout. And Bob Barr has the support of Rep. Ron Paul, who did so well in the Republican primary debates.</p>
<p>Here’s  Bob’s Web site: <a href="http://www.bobbarr2008.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bobbarr2008.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Larsen</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Larsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2008/10/18/fannie-and-freddie-as-greater-fools/#comment-7385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;How shrewd of Congress. It could pursue the laudable goal of affordable housing, without any explicit federal subsidy,&quot;
And how shrew of congress to create a government sponsored entity as a source of millions in campaign money and other influence peddling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How shrewd of Congress. It could pursue the laudable goal of affordable housing, without any explicit federal subsidy,&#8221;<br />
And how shrew of congress to create a government sponsored entity as a source of millions in campaign money and other influence peddling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

