<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law&#8217;s Primacy in L&amp;E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Larry for the trackback and to Josh and Bruce for your comments. Josh, you make a good point about L&amp;E&#039;s predicted future focus on comparative institutional analysis. That may well be L&amp;E&#039;s future. Bruce, I agree with you that adequacy/sufficiency rather than completeness is what&#039;s critical. I&#039;m happy to withdraw the word &quot;complete&quot;! And you&#039;re also right that it&#039;s important for any scholar to be acutely aware of any limitations that he faces in his skill set and knowledge. Quite so!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Larry for the trackback and to Josh and Bruce for your comments. Josh, you make a good point about L&amp;E&#8217;s predicted future focus on comparative institutional analysis. That may well be L&amp;E&#8217;s future. Bruce, I agree with you that adequacy/sufficiency rather than completeness is what&#8217;s critical. I&#8217;m happy to withdraw the word &#8220;complete&#8221;! And you&#8217;re also right that it&#8217;s important for any scholar to be acutely aware of any limitations that he faces in his skill set and knowledge. Quite so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Boyden</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Boyden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;but you wonâ€™t be able to describe the law with complete depth and precision&quot;

*Complete* depth and precision is not the test, however.  The question is, can non-JDs describe the law with *adequate* depth and precision.  As with most things interdisciplinary, I don&#039;t see why not, as long as the scholar in question invests sufficient time and is aware of their limitations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but you wonâ€™t be able to describe the law with complete depth and precision&#8221;</p>
<p>*Complete* depth and precision is not the test, however.  The question is, can non-JDs describe the law with *adequate* depth and precision.  As with most things interdisciplinary, I don&#8217;t see why not, as long as the scholar in question invests sufficient time and is aware of their limitations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post, Keith.  The tradeoffs here seem clear.  An econ PhD program offers some things that an econ phd at a law school probably does not.  Conversely, study at a law school program offers a chance to learn the law and legal institutions in greater detail.  Both paths involve opportunity costs.  The question is how to economize on these tradeoffs.  One interesting thing in Posner&#039;s essay that supports your claim is his prediction that empirical, comparative analysis of institutions is the future of L&amp;E (rather than say, applied micro and modeling).  An alternative answer, of course, is to just to both --- which imposes its own unique set of costs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Keith.  The tradeoffs here seem clear.  An econ PhD program offers some things that an econ phd at a law school probably does not.  Conversely, study at a law school program offers a chance to learn the law and legal institutions in greater detail.  Both paths involve opportunity costs.  The question is how to economize on these tradeoffs.  One interesting thing in Posner&#8217;s essay that supports your claim is his prediction that empirical, comparative analysis of institutions is the future of L&amp;E (rather than say, applied micro and modeling).  An alternative answer, of course, is to just to both &#8212; which imposes its own unique set of costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legal Theory Blog</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Theory Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/08/04/laws-primacy-in-le-3/#comment-6106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Posner on Shavell in the Blogosphere...&lt;/strong&gt;

Essential blogsurfing today:Posner on the Overlapping Generations of Law and Economics by Josh Wright. Lawâ€™s Primacy in LE by Keith Sharfman.Both posts react to Richard Posner&#039;s review of Steven Shavellâ€™s Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law in the...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Posner on Shavell in the Blogosphere&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Essential blogsurfing today:Posner on the Overlapping Generations of Law and Economics by Josh Wright. Lawâ€™s Primacy in LE by Keith Sharfman.Both posts react to Richard Posner&#8217;s review of Steven Shavellâ€™s Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law in the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

