<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Reich on the Massachusetts Health Care Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/04/12/robert-reich-on-the-massachusetts-health-care-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/04/12/robert-reich-on-the-massachusetts-health-care-plan/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:37:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamChevre</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/04/12/robert-reich-on-the-massachusetts-health-care-plan/#comment-5730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamChevre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/04/12/robert-reich-on-the-massachusetts-health-care-plan/#comment-5730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s worth noting that Reich is eliding a key distinction between health insurance and automobile insurance: automobile insurance is (in most states) well underwritten, and health insurance isn&#039;t.  This difference creates the cross-subsidization issue you mention.

In other words, it might be reasonable to require young people to purchase health insurance to cover their own expected costs of health care, at a price reflecting those costs; that is what we do with automobile insurance.  What Massachusets is doing is requiring them to buy such insurance, and also to pay the difference between their health-care costs and the average person&#039;s to provide care for others; that is noticeably less reasonable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that Reich is eliding a key distinction between health insurance and automobile insurance: automobile insurance is (in most states) well underwritten, and health insurance isn&#8217;t.  This difference creates the cross-subsidization issue you mention.</p>
<p>In other words, it might be reasonable to require young people to purchase health insurance to cover their own expected costs of health care, at a price reflecting those costs; that is what we do with automobile insurance.  What Massachusets is doing is requiring them to buy such insurance, and also to pay the difference between their health-care costs and the average person&#8217;s to provide care for others; that is noticeably less reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

