<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will SCOTUS Tame the Exotic Beast?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: accident lawyer</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[accident lawyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;accident lawyer...&lt;/strong&gt;

accident lawyer...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>accident lawyer&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>accident lawyer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; SCOTUS Slays the &#8220;Exotic Beast&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; SCOTUS Slays the &#8220;Exotic Beast&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; SCOTUS Slays the &#8220;Exotic Beast&#8221; on Good antitrust news from the Court.Kate Litvak on Can the SEC Exempt Small Companies from Sarbanes-Oxley 404? (Part 2).TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Good antitrust news from the Court on Will SCOTUS Tame the Exotic Beast?.TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Can the SEC Exempt Small Companies from Sarbanes-Oxley 404? (Part 2) on Can the SEC Exempt Small Companies From Sarbanes-Oxley 404?.KipEsquire on Decline of the Blogosphere.Scott Peterson on Blogroll Addition Notwithstanding Lawsuit Threat.Abnormal Returns &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday links: commitment of traders on Hedge-Fund-Like Mutual Funds.Geoffrey Manne on H&amp;R Block Botches Its Own Taxes.Ideoblog on On disclosure: The hydraulic theory.Bill Sjostrom on H&amp;R Block Botches Its Own Taxes. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TRUTH ON THE MARKET &raquo; SCOTUS Slays the &#8220;Exotic Beast&#8221; on Good antitrust news from the Court.Kate Litvak on Can the SEC Exempt Small Companies from Sarbanes-Oxley 404? (Part 2).TRUTH ON THE MARKET &raquo; Good antitrust news from the Court on Will SCOTUS Tame the Exotic Beast?.TRUTH ON THE MARKET &raquo; Can the SEC Exempt Small Companies from Sarbanes-Oxley 404? (Part 2) on Can the SEC Exempt Small Companies From Sarbanes-Oxley 404?.KipEsquire on Decline of the Blogosphere.Scott Peterson on Blogroll Addition Notwithstanding Lawsuit Threat.Abnormal Returns &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Friday links: commitment of traders on Hedge-Fund-Like Mutual Funds.Geoffrey Manne on H&#038;R Block Botches Its Own Taxes.Ideoblog on On disclosure: The hydraulic theory.Bill Sjostrom on H&#038;R Block Botches Its Own Taxes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Good antitrust news from the Court</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Good antitrust news from the Court]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Josh earlier reported on this case here. At the time he noted: My prediction? SCOTUS will, as expected, tame the exotic beast. But how? I am doubtful, like Professor Ghosh at AntitrustProf Blog, that the Court will attempt to articulate an extension of the Copperweld doctrine (which protects wholly-owned subsidiaries from charges of intra-enterprise conspiracy under Section 1) to joint ventures. The United States Amici brief supporting Shell and Texaco urges the Court to take another route, ruling that per se analysis should not apply to this type of agreement because it â€œcould not, and did not, itself eliminate competition.â€? That sounds right to me. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Josh earlier reported on this case here. At the time he noted: My prediction? SCOTUS will, as expected, tame the exotic beast. But how? I am doubtful, like Professor Ghosh at AntitrustProf Blog, that the Court will attempt to articulate an extension of the Copperweld doctrine (which protects wholly-owned subsidiaries from charges of intra-enterprise conspiracy under Section 1) to joint ventures. The United States Amici brief supporting Shell and Texaco urges the Court to take another route, ruling that per se analysis should not apply to this type of agreement because it â€œcould not, and did not, itself eliminate competition.â€? That sounds right to me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Jared.  I believe it is fixed now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jared.  I believe it is fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your link to Christine&#039;s post appears to be broken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link to Christine&#8217;s post appears to be broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/will-scotus-tame-the-exotic-beast/#comment-5190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great blog, but do you really want to trademark this: &quot;Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more&quot;?  It&#039;s tacky.  There are millions of bloggers out there, and if everyone starts trademarking everything then there will hardly be an un-trademarked phrase available.  It&#039;s not in the spirit of openness that the internet thrives on.  Are you really going to bring a trademark action against some other blogger that also wants to use this byline?  Look around at the most famous and widely read bloggers.  They don&#039;t thrive because of their cleverly trademarked name or phrase; it&#039;s because the quality of their work draws people back.  Any &quot;copycat&quot; would just wither on the vine.  You&#039;re not selling widgets here, you&#039;re having a conversation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog, but do you really want to trademark this: &#8220;Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more&#8221;?  It&#8217;s tacky.  There are millions of bloggers out there, and if everyone starts trademarking everything then there will hardly be an un-trademarked phrase available.  It&#8217;s not in the spirit of openness that the internet thrives on.  Are you really going to bring a trademark action against some other blogger that also wants to use this byline?  Look around at the most famous and widely read bloggers.  They don&#8217;t thrive because of their cleverly trademarked name or phrase; it&#8217;s because the quality of their work draws people back.  Any &#8220;copycat&#8221; would just wither on the vine.  You&#8217;re not selling widgets here, you&#8217;re having a conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

