<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs, Law Reviews, and the Economics of Superstars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/</link>
	<description>Academic commentary on law, business, economics and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sale</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Post!
I have been reading your blog most links- I wonder how you&#039;ll keep up this amazing flow of brilliant content. That is awesome!
We will be linking soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!<br />
I have been reading your blog most links- I wonder how you&#8217;ll keep up this amazing flow of brilliant content. That is awesome!<br />
We will be linking soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Should Lexis and Westlaw License Google PageRank?</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Should Lexis and Westlaw License Google PageRank?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A few days ago, I proposed an analogy between blog entries and law review articles. I noted that searching the blogosphere is similar to searching the law review databases in Lexis or Westlaw in the sense that search results of both types are largely content-driven rather than reputation-based. Only relevant content, not past popularity, can generate search hits. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few days ago, I proposed an analogy between blog entries and law review articles. I noted that searching the blogosphere is similar to searching the law review databases in Lexis or Westlaw in the sense that search results of both types are largely content-driven rather than reputation-based. Only relevant content, not past popularity, can generate search hits. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with the law blog/law review analogy. Wasn&#039;t it John Stuart Mills ... Welcome to the blogosphere.  www.ChinaLawBlog.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the law blog/law review analogy. Wasn&#8217;t it John Stuart Mills &#8230; Welcome to the blogosphere.  <a href="http://www.ChinaLawBlog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ChinaLawBlog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LexBlog Blog</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LexBlog Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 05:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Law professor blogs and are law reviews in the making...&lt;/strong&gt;

Keith Sharfman, a law professor at Rutgers posts that blogs are comparable to law reviews. Law reviews provide an instructive analogy. Self-doubt often accompanies the launch of a new law journal. First issue law review volumes abound with short pieces...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Law professor blogs and are law reviews in the making&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Keith Sharfman, a law professor at Rutgers posts that blogs are comparable to law reviews. Law reviews provide an instructive analogy. Self-doubt often accompanies the launch of a new law journal. First issue law review volumes abound with short pieces&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s great to hear from Ted, a very talented guy who (as usual)
is right. Content is only one factor among many. Readership matters too.
That&#039;s why I say that market share is &quot;largely&quot; search-driven.
But really good content *can* be sufficient in itself.
If an entry is especially good, it *will* be linked to,
and it *will* come up in Google searches, even without a committed
regular readership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to hear from Ted, a very talented guy who (as usual)<br />
is right. Content is only one factor among many. Readership matters too.<br />
That&#8217;s why I say that market share is &#8220;largely&#8221; search-driven.<br />
But really good content *can* be sufficient in itself.<br />
If an entry is especially good, it *will* be linked to,<br />
and it *will* come up in Google searches, even without a committed<br />
regular readership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2006/01/17/blogs-law-reviews-and-the-economics-of-superstars/#comment-5211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;A bloggerâ€™s reputation cannot in itself trigger search hits in the absence of search-relevant content.&lt;/i&gt;

This merely states that search-relevant content is necessary.  It hardly supports your argument that it&#039;s sufficient.  If the blog doesn&#039;t have regular readership, the page doesn&#039;t get linked to, and the post gets pushed down the Google search rankings -- otherwise, all of the splogs that pollute Technorati searches would overwhelm Google searches.

Still, glad to see yet another Easterbrook clerk blogging.  Looking forward to reading future posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A bloggerâ€™s reputation cannot in itself trigger search hits in the absence of search-relevant content.</i></p>
<p>This merely states that search-relevant content is necessary.  It hardly supports your argument that it&#8217;s sufficient.  If the blog doesn&#8217;t have regular readership, the page doesn&#8217;t get linked to, and the post gets pushed down the Google search rankings &#8212; otherwise, all of the splogs that pollute Technorati searches would overwhelm Google searches.</p>
<p>Still, glad to see yet another Easterbrook clerk blogging.  Looking forward to reading future posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

